Pages

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Why this maverick investor is betting on Vodafone Idea Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com

 

After its big bet on Adani companies paid back spectacularly, America's GQG Partners, an investment boutique which manages global and emerging market equities for institutions, advisors, and individuals worldwide, is betting on another beleaguered company. Headed by Indian-origin veteran fund manager Rajiv Jain, GQG Partners is looking to invest nearly $400 million in Vodafone Idea's share sale that started today and closes on April 22, ET has reported. This is being seen as a big endorsement for a loss-making, debt-ridden Vodafone Idea (Vi), a joint venture between Vodafone Group Plc and the Aditya Birla Group.

However, Adani's crisis was different from Vi's. While Adani faced an existential threat that emerged from mere allegations by American short-seller Hindenburg Research, Vi faces grave structural issues that can't just blow away. That's why the Florida-based investment firm's bet on Vi looks outlandish.

Yet, many see a ray of hope for the struggling company. The Rs 18,000 crore follow-on public offer (FPO) which starts today, India's largest, is part of the overall plan to raise Rs 45,000 crore through debt and equity. Many think the fund-raise will buoy the company and strengthen it.

Besides GQG Partners, Vi has got an impressive line-up of anchor investors which include foreigners Fidelity Management & Research, UBS and RWC and Indians HDFC Mutual Fund, Quant Mutual Fund and Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund.

Why Vi is full of hope

Vi is now a too-big-to-fail enterprise due to its nearly 20 crore subscriber base. Failure of Vodafone will be devastating for India's telecom sector as a whole because Jio and Airtel don’t have the capacity to absorb such a huge subscriber base of Vi. This will constrain their infrastructure and worsen service and quality standards.

The government, which is the biggest shareholder, currently holds around 32% stake in Vi, which is likely to come down to 24% after the FPO. It had converted dues into equity for Vi's inability to pay. A few days ago, Finance Secretary TV Somanathan said in an interview that preserving competition with multiple operators in the market is a major policy goal of the government. Many think this could mean the government converting more dues into equity in future.

Vi's hope stems from the ongoing fund-raise, expectation of the government help in future regarding the huge government dues Vi has to pay. and rise in tariffs.

Akshaya Moondra, the Vi CEO, says investors are confident about the India story and Vi's fortunes are closely connected to that. "Population is growing. Penetration is below where it should be. ARPUs are somewhere lowest in the world. So, telecom industry potential is there. As far as Vodafone Idea is concerned, they have seen 10 quarters of consistent performance with very limited investments, strong brand loyalty and some of the strength areas that we have our customer focus," he has told ET Now.


The funding is largely for growth capex. Vi has to expand its 4G network and start rolling out a 5G network. This will strengthen its network, allowing the company to arrest 4G market share losses in the near term, say analysts. Moondhra says customer acquisition will be no problem once they start expanding the 4G network

"If you were to ask me what is the reason we continue to lose subscribers disproportionately, there is only one reason, which is lack of 4G coverage, and it is quite significant because we could not invest after the AGR judgment," Moondhra said. "Now the point is that as we make these investments, today, if you will see our share of customer acquisitions, it is already higher than our customer market share which is the thing which most people do not realise, which means we are able to attract customers without difficulty wherever we have a service and a coverage of 4G coverage customers are coming to us."

Soon, a rise in tariffs is inevitable which will help Vodafone, Moondhra hopes. "Today India is about $2.1 of ARPU (average revenue per user) whereas China, a comparable size of population and economy, of course, its economy is larger, is over $6.5. So we are less than one-third of China's ARPU. So, by that benchmark there is a lot of room for ARPU to go up. The second is that today none of the players in the industry are returning their cost of capital. It has been six or seven years and the situation has got more accentuated," he said.

As per analysts, the fundraise will enable Vi to ramp up network capex and narrow the gap with Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel on 4G coverage and 5G rollout. “Combined with potential tariff hikes after elections and possibility of AGR relief (matter pending in Supreme Court), this should significantly boost VIL’s cash flow position,” Citi Research said in a report.

Vi's challenges

Vi’s gross debt at the end of the third quarter stood at a huge Rs 2.14 lakh crore, comprising deferred spectrum payment obligations of Rs 1.38 lakh crore, adjusted gross revenue (AGR) liability of Rs 69,020 crore due to the government, dues of Rs 6,050 crore towards banks and financial institutions, and optionally convertible debentures amounting to Rs 1,660 crore. As the debt widened in the fiscal third quarter, cash and cash equivalents were at Rs 318.9 crore. The company says its bank debt now stands at less than Rs. 4,500 crore.
.
The company has been reporting quarterly losses as well as losing subscribers to Airtel and Reliance Jio month after month.Many think the ongoing fund-raise can improve the fortunes of the company but temporarily. That’s because challenges remain in the long run, particularly after the second half of FY26, when the moratorium ends on spectrum and AGR payments.

Vi has lost 19% of its market share since Vodafone’s merger with Idea due to inadequate network spending. “We expect Vi to bridge the network coverage gap on 4G and arrest some of the market share losses. However, the gap in 5G coverage (versus larger peers) would still remain significant,” Kotak Institutional Equities says.

Further, the fortunes of Vi depend a lot on the government's decision to convert more dues into equity going forward. Analysts feel that the company may still face a cash shortfall post the second half of FY26 when the moratorium on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues and spectrum repayments ends. “…unless the government exercises the option to convert these dues into equity – this remains a key uncertainty from both a cash flow and an equity dilution perspective, and we await further developments,” Citi Research reckons.

“Even if we assume a 20% step change in tariff followed by a 10% per annum tariff compounding and no subscriber erosion, we estimate it would take Vi well over 20 years to organically pay back government obligations,” Macquarie said. It added that in the absence of government write-offs, this constrained cash flow and potential dilution dynamic remains a fundamental challenge.



'We never compromise on nutritional quality': Nestle issues clarification on Cerelac sugar controversy Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com

 

Nestle India on Thursday responded to the recent controversy surrounding the sugar content in its Cerelac baby food products with a clarification.

"We would like to assure you that our Infant Cereal products, are manufactured to ensure the appropriate delivery of nutritional requirements such as Protein, Carbohydrates, Vitamins, Minerals, Iron etc. for early childhood," ANI quoted the company as saying.

"We never compromise and will never compromise on the nutritional quality of our products. We constantly leverage our extensive Global Research and Development network to enhance the nutritional profile of our products," it further added.

Nestlé India spokesperson said, "Compliance is an essential characteristic of Nestlé India and we will never compromise on that. We also ensure that our products manufactured in India are in full and strict compliance with CODEX standards (a commission established by WHO and FAO) and local specifications (as required) pertaining to the requirements all nutrients including added sugars. Reduction of added sugars is a priority for Nestlé India. Over the past 5 years, we have already reduced added sugars by up to 30%, depending on the variant. We regularly review our portfolio and continue to innovate and reformulate our products to further reduce the level of added sugars, without compromising on nutrition, quality, safety, and taste. Nestlé India is committed to delivering the best nutrition to our consumers, which we have been doing for over 100 years and would always maintain highest standards of Nutrition, Quality and Safety in our products."

Sugar controversy

Nestle adds sugar to infant milk sold in less affluent nations including India but not in its primary markets like Europe or the UK, reported ToI. The revelation came to light when "Public Eye," a Swiss investigative organization, and IBFAN (International Baby Food Action Network) dispatched samples of the company's baby food items marketed in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to a Belgian laboratory for examination.

In the lucrative Indian market, exceeding $250 million in sales in 2022, every Cerelac baby cereal variant contains supplementary sugar, averaging nearly 3 grams per portion. "Public Eye's" recent inquiry, disclosed on Wednesday, indicated that Cerelac wheat-based cereals tailored for six-month-old infants retailed by Nestle in Germany, France, and the UK are devoid of additional sugar. Conversely, the identical product harbors more than 5 grams per serving in Ethiopia and 6 grams in Thailand.

Meanwhile, Nestle India's stock price has recently dipped below its 100-day Simple Moving Average, currently standing at Rs 2526.2 at 9:30 am on Thursday. The percentage change today is -0.78%, with the 100-day SMA at Rs 2532.78. This movement indicates a potential shift in the stock's trend.

FSSAI takes cognisance

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has initiated an inquiry into the sugar content controversy surrounding Nestle's Cerelac products.

In response to the allegations, FSSAI has affirmed its commitment to investigating the issue thoroughly. If Nestle is found to be at fault, the regulatory body has vowed to take stringent action against the brand. As part of the investigative process, a committee will be formed to delve into the details of the case.

As the inquiry unfolds, stakeholders will be keenly observing the proceedings, awaiting the outcome of the investigation and the potential ramifications for Nestle.

ATTITUDE MATTERS

 


Vodafone Idea FPO opens today. Should you bid? Here's what GMP, experts say about the ₹18,000-crore issue :-livemint 18 Apr 2024, 08:08 AM IST

 

Vodafone Idea FPO date of subscription is scheduled to open today (Thursday, April 18) and will close on Monday, April 22. Vodafone Idea FPO price band has been set in the range of 10 to 11 apiece. There is a minimum bid limit of 1,298 equity shares, and beyond that, bids may be placed in multiples of 1,298 equity shares. All market experts appear bullish about the FPO issue. 

According to the red herring prospectus (RHP), the net proceeds from the new issue will be used by the company to finance the following: (i) acquisition of equipment for the expansion of its network infrastructure, amounting to 12,750 crore; this includes (a) the establishment of new 4G sites; (b) the augmentation of capacity at both existing and new 4G sites; and (c) the establishment of new 5G sites; (ii) payment of certain deferred payments for spectrum to the DoT and the GST thereon, amounting to 2,175 crore; and (v) the remaining amount for general corporate purposes.

Government stake in Vodafone idea is 32.19% based on the shareholding pattern for the quarter that ended in March (Q4FY24), as per BSE data.

As per news reports, in 2022, Vodafone Idea transformed its unpaid debt to the government into a 36% stake, making the Indian government the company's largest stakeholder.

On Tuesday's session, Vodafone Idea share price ended 1.82% lower at 12.92 apiece on BSE. 

Vodafone Idea FPO GMP or grey market premium is 1.50. According to investorgain.com, the expected listing price for VI FPO is 12.5, or a gain of around 13.64%.

Let's see what experts think about the FPO, whether or not investors should subscribe, and what kind of subscriptions they expect.

Here’s what the experts predict

Mohit Gulati, CIO & Managing Partner of ITI Growth Opportunities Fund

"Since 2016, I have advocated the phrase: "Roti, Kapda, Maakan aur Data!"

Owing to that, I have remained invested in all the listed telecom players in India—RIL, Bharti, and VI(since 4 rupees!).

My logic for VI is simple- It's an old network with a carved niche where customer loyalty, despite all its deterioration, has still managed to stay. The perception that VI is a premium player vs, say, Jio, which is 'massy', has held a lot of high ARPU lazy postpaid customers staying on board even though it's the only network with no 5G yet!

From the GOI's perspective, they can't allow a duopoly to own this space; this, clubbed with the sentimental block of driving away an incumbent British Telco out of the country owing to high spectrum fees and taxes, won't do well for Delhi's global ambitions and ease of doing business narrative.

This FPO will receive a great response, and I'm very confident that the company will return to its past strength with new 5G services and the almost imminent post-election increase in tariffs across all telcos in India.

All in all, a must subscribe from my end! ," said Gulati.

Arun Kejriwal, founder of Kejriwal Research and Investment Services

Kejriwal claims that there is a lot of expectation and talk that this scrip would follow Yes Bank's lead and that there will be a lot of interest after this issue. There will be a chance for investors to profit handsomely. Without any doubts, the scrip should do well since there is a lot of demand in it and a substantial or respectable premium being offered on the grey market. Regarding the application, it is justified because there is a 15-20% profit margin to be made now. It's uncertain if it will stay there or if it will somewhat rise or decline.

“However, the intention of the government is very clear. They don't want this company to fail and allow this important sector to be a duopoly. So they will back this company. With the fund raise, they would look into capex, which they haven't done in a very long time," added Arun. 

Prashanth Tapse, Research Analyst, Senior Vice President of Research at Mehta Equities

The Vodafone Idea FPO is believed to be going big. If it is completely subscribed, Tapse claims, it will be the largest FPO in history, surpassing the 15,000 crore Yes Bank and 10,542 crore ONGC offers.

According to Prashanth, Vodafone Idea is now facing financial strain to maintain its balance sheet and eventually operate the firm in a competitive market because of its debt and unpaid AGR to the government.

If FPO's complete subscription would bring the firm a significant financial boost and allow it to spend and grow more quickly in its 4G infrastructure and the establishment of 5G infrastructure, which is urgently needed.

"Both the industry perspective and the execution strategy are critical to the FPO's success. Given that I think the FPO offer price range is a little conservative  for investors, I think a lot of funds or investors will be drawn in by the industry's projected growth," said Tapse.

Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts, experts and broking companies, not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.



What next for Vodafone Idea? :-ET used here for Educational purposes only for students

 Vodafone Idea’s ongoing INR45,000 crore fundraise through a mix of equity and debt will improve the fortunes of the company, albeit temporarily.

That’s because challenges remain in the long run, particularly after the second half of FY26, when the moratorium ends on spectrum and AGR payments.

As per analysts, the fundraise will enable Vodafone Idea (Vi) to ramp up network capex and narrow the gap with Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel on 4G coverage and 5G rollout. “Combined with potential tariff hikes after elections and possibility of AGR relief (matter pending in Supreme Court), this should significantly boost VIL’s cash flow position,” Citi Research said in a report.

The company is planning to raise INR18,000 crore through a follow-on public offer (FPO) and another INR25,000 crore through debt. In addition, the company has already approved raising INR2,075 crore from a promoter entity through a preferential share issue.

The company plans to utilise 70% of the FPO proceeds for boosting 4G coverage and capacity and 5G rollout. It will strengthen Vi's network, allowing the company to arrest 4G market share losses in the near term, say analysts.Vi has lost 19% of its market share since Vodafone’s merger with Idea due to inadequate network spending. “We expect Vi to bridge the network coverage gap on 4G and arrest some of the market share losses. However, the gap in 5G coverage (versus larger peers) would still remain significant,” Kotak Institutional Equities says.

Further, the fortunes of Vi depend a lot on the government's decision to convert more dues into equity going forward. Analysts feel that the company may still face a cash shortfall post the second half of FY26 when the moratorium on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues and spectrum repayments ends. “…unless the government exercises the option to convert these dues into equity – this remains a key uncertainty from both a cash flow and an equity dilution perspective, and we await further developments,” Citi Research reckons.

Vi has around INR2.15 lakh crore in government obligations. The government, however, has the option to convert some dues into equity, a decision that will be taken later. The government currently holds around 32% stake in Vi, which is likely to come down to 24% post the FPO.

“Even if we assume a 20% step change in tariff followed by a 10% per annum tariff compounding and no subscriber erosion, we estimate it would take Vi well over 20 years to organically pay back government obligations,” Macquarie said. It added that in the absence of government write-offs, this constrained cash flow and potential dilution dynamic remains a fundamental challenge.

Ahead of Elon Musk's visit, Centre notifies liberalised FDI norms for space sector to boost foreign investment :-ET

 


The government has notified amendments to the foreign direct investment policy in the space sector to attract offshore investors in satellite manufacturing and satellite launch vehicles segments.

Amendment made in the FDI policy for space sector through a gazette notification dated April 16, 2024, prescribes liberalized entry route and provides clarity for FDI in satellites, launch vehicles and associated systems or subsystems, creation of spaceports for launching and receiving Spacecraft and manufacturing of space-related components and systems.

"These rules may be called the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) (Third Amendment) Rules, 2024," the gazette notification said.

The liberalized entry routes under the amended policy are aimed at attracting potential investors in the Indian companies in space.

The Union Cabinet earlier this year gave approval to these amendments.The notification comes days ahead of the scheduled visit of Tesla CEO Elon Musk who is expected to meet with various Indian space companies during his visit from April 21 to 22.

Concurrently, approvals for Musk's satellite internet project, Starlink, are nearing finalization.

As per the notification, up to 74 per cent FDI for satellite manufacturing & operation, satellite data products and ground segment & user segment are allowed under automatic route. Beyond 74 per cent these activities are under government route.

FDI up to 49 per cent is allowed for Launch Vehicles and associated systems or subsystems, Creation of Spaceports for launching and receiving Spacecraft are under automatic route but beyond 49 per cent government permission would be required.

Besides, 100 per cent FDI allowed for manufacturing of components and systems/ sub-systems for satellites, ground segment and user segment without government permission.As per the earlier norms, FDI was permitted in establishment and operation of Satellites through the government approval route only.

In line with the vision and strategy under the Indian Space Policy 2023, the Union Cabinet has eased the FDI policy in the Space sector by prescribing liberalized FDI thresholds for various sub-sectors/activities.

The Department of Space consulted with internal stakeholders like IN-SPACe, ISRO and NSIL as well as several industrial stakeholders. NGEs have developed capabilities and expertise in the areas of satellites and launch vehicles. With increased investment, they would be able to achieve sophistication of products, global scale of operations and enhanced share of the global space economy.




What are GPUs? Why is India scrambling for them? Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com

 

The Narendra Modi government has become known for its focus on building roads, highways, railways and airports, the infrastructure that speeds up economic growth. Now, it is planning to build another kind of infrastructure, the infrastructure that boosts research, innovation and development in artificial intelligence, machine learning and data processing and management. As India is getting more and more digital, it needs more computing infrastructure, and for that it needs cutting-edge computing hardware, the GPUs, or graphic processing units.

Since GPUs are scarce and very expensive, the Indian government has two options: let businesses and industry solve its own GPU problem or spend public money to make GPUs more accessible to startups, research bodies and key industries, just as it has done with the Production-linked Incentives (PLI) scheme to promote key industries for its Make in India mission. In the first case, India will remain a laggard in AI and other emerging technologies; in the second, it can emerge as a new-age tech hub. Large domestic computing capacity also ensures a country's data sovereignty.

GPU access: Govt may chip in with Nvidia deal

The government has realised the importance of GPUs for India and is working to find a solution. It may strike a deal with Nvidia, the world's biggest GPU producer, to source graphics processing units (GPUs) from it, and offer them to local startups, researchers, academic institutions and other users at a subsidized rate under its Rs 10,000 crore Artificial Intelligence Mission, ET has reported based on information form sources.

What exactly are GPUs, and what is their use?

GPU, as the name suggests, is basically a technology that can render graphics better. A more familiar related technology is the CPU, or central processing unit, which is the brain of a computer. A GPU is often called a computer's heart or soul. GPUs are an evolved form of CPUs for their capacity of parallel computing. While the CPU mostly tackles tasks one by one, the GPU can break a huge and complex task into thousands or millions of small parts and execute them at once. That's why a GPU has such humungous computing power.

Graphics card, which helped your computer display images better, was an early avatar of GPU. Originally, like graphics cards, GPUs were used for better and faster rendering of 3D graphics and, therefore, were mainly of importance for gaming and 3D modelling. However, now their huge computing power is used for artificial intelligence, machine learning and supercomputing. With the sudden explosion of AI in the past few years, GPUs have become the most wanted, and expensive, hardware for computing.They are also needed in data centres where data in very large amounts has to be processed and managed.

Why India needs GPUs so much

India has turned digital at a mass level in the past decade. Due to explosive growth in digital payments due to the India stack, data revolution in telecom after Reliance Jio brought down tariffs, and government schemes that promote digital technologies, deeper penetration of internet, the launch of 5G services, growth of e-commerce, etc. India needs a bigger and more powerful digital hardware infrastructure, the GPUs, that is.

With so much of business, economic and social activities going digital, more and more data centres are coming up in India, especially when the government also wants companies to store Indian data in India itself. These data centres need GPUs.

But even more importantly, India needs GPUs to spur innovation in emerging technologies such as AI. Startups, small innovators and businesses and academics can't afford to buy GPUs. India's computing infrastructure is less than 2 percent of global capacity which is a limiting factor in its contribution to research that remains in the range of 2 per cent, as per NVIDIA Asia South MD Vishal Dhupar. While speaking at StartUp Mahakumbh last month, Dhupar said, "India today is approximately sub-2 per cent as compared to the US and China combined which is closer to 58-59 per cent." He said India's contribution to research globally has a direct correlation with its low computing capacity. Indians abroad, Dhupar said, are contributing 12 percent because of the computing infrastructure available there.

India now has over 100 generative AI startups. But the investment into this sector has been comparatively small. The US saw nearly $250 billion private investments into AI startups between 2013 and 2022, while investments in India stood at just $8 billion. Over the same period, China saw $95 billion of investments while for the UK, the number stood at $18 billion, as per data from the AI Index 2023 Annual Report.

If India needs to be among the leaders in emerging technologies, it must acquire more computing power.

What government can do

The problem with the GPU access in India is that GPUs are expensive and scarce. According to industry estimates, NVIDIA dominates the GPU market with about 88 per cent share and there is a lag of 12-18 months in getting GPUs from the company due to its high demand across the world.

In such a scenario, the government will have to spend money to make GPUs accessible to industry, innovators and academia. The governments often give incentives to industries and businesses which are vital for economic growth. For instance, the government has spent billions of dollars on the PLI scheme to subsidise several kinds of industries to make India a manufacturing power and achieve self-reliance. A similar initiative is required in case of GPU access too.

Already, the government has approved the India AI Mission with an outlay of Rs 10,372 crore for five years to encourage AI development in the country. Under this mission, supercomputing capacity, comprising over 10,000 GPUs, will be made available to various stakeholders for creating an AI ecosystem “The government’s AI mission is incredibly exciting for India and its vibrant startup ecosystem. Investing in 10,000 GPUs and making them available to researchers and innovators will make a huge difference as we aim to build (India) the AI application capital of the world,” Rajan Anandan, managing director, Peak XV Partners, has told ET recently, adding that it will provide critical building blocks that AI startups can leverage to “build in India, for India and for the world”.

Globally, countries like the UK, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been shelling big money to acquire AI chips to boost their countries' companies. For instance, the UK is building a national AI resource, as a part of which it would acquire 5,000 Nvidia GPUs. Saudi Arabia, through the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, reportedly bought 3,000 Nvidia GPUs worth $40,000 each. This year, the UAE announced a $500 million investment to Falcon Foundation to develop open-source generative AI models and provide technology access to emerging economies.

Pointing out that the “market of GPUs is very dynamic with new technologies coming in and rendering existing technologies outdated,” Tanuj Bhojwani, head, people+ai, an initiative by Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani’s EkStep Foundation, has told ET recently that “the government should play the role of investor and not (of) a purchaser or a customer. “Merely going out into the market and purchasing 10,000 GPUs may not do the trick, the government should think like an investor,” he added.

India is considering two possible ways to provide AI compute infrastructure to its companies, as GPUs have become a very expensive and scarce resource, ET has reported.While one is "rent-and-sublet", where the ministry of electronics and information technology will acquire the GPUs from Nvidia, the other is a marketplace model where the government will encourage companies themselves to strike a renting or subletting deal with the supplier and then provide them incentives, as under production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes. "These incentives will be based on incremental productivity achieved through these GPUs," a government official has told ET.

GPUs are a critical but scarce resource and that's why an effective government intervention is required for affordable and accessible GPUs.


Israel-Iran crisis: Options and dilemmas :-ET

 

TEL AVIV: Israeli leaders on Tuesday were debating how best to respond to Iran's unprecedented weekend airstrike, officials said, weighing a set of options calibrated to achieve different strategic outcomes: deterring a similar attack in the future, placating their American allies and avoiding all-out war.

Iran's attack on Israel, an immense barrage that included hundreds of ballistic missiles and exploding drones, changed the unspoken rules in the archrivals' long-running shadow war. In that conflict, major airstrikes from one country's territory directly against the other had been avoided.


Given that change in precedent, the calculus by which Israel decides its next move has also changed, said the Israeli officials who requested anonymity to discuss Iran.

"We cannot stand still from this kind of aggression," Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the spokesperson for Israel's military said Tuesday. Iran, he added, would not get off "scot-free with this aggression."

As Israel's war cabinet met to consider a military response, other countries were applying diplomatic pressure to both Israel and Iran in the hopes of de-escalating the conflict.Almost all of the missiles and drones fired in Iran's attack early Sunday were intercepted by Israel and its allies, including the United States and Britain.

The attack, Iran said, was a response to an Israeli airstrike this month, in which several armed forces commanders were killed in an attack in Syria. That attack on an Iranian embassy building in Damascus was different from previous targeted assassinations of individuals in the shadow war.

That strike destroyed a building that was part of an Iranian embassy complex, the sort of facility normally considered off-limits to attack. Israeli officials said the building was diplomatic in name only, and used as an Iranian military and intelligence base, making it a legitimate target.

Iran, which signaled that it saw the attack as an Israeli break in the norms of the shadow war, felt compelled to retaliate strongly, analysts said, in order to establish deterrence and maintain credibility with its proxies and hard-line supporters.

Israel does not want Iran to conclude that it can now attack Israeli territory in response to an Israeli strike on Iranian interests in a third country, some of the officials said, summarizing the internal Israeli debate. But, they added, Israel also does not want and cannot afford a major conflict with Iran while still fighting a war in Gaza and skirmishing with Iranian proxies along its borders.

The members of Israel's small but fractious war Cabinet, officials said, are considering options big enough to send a clear message to Iran that such attacks will not go unanswered, but not so big as to spark a major escalation.

The officials described the following options, and their downsides, from which the Israeli leaders are choosing a response:


-- Conduct an aggressive strike on an Iranian target, such as a Revolutionary Guard base, in a country other than Iran like Syria. (The drawback is that it lacks the symmetry of responding to a direct attack on Israel with a direct attack on Iran.)

-- Strike a mostly symbolic target inside Iran. (Such a move would likely require U.S. consultation and would risk angering the Americans who have advised against such a strike.)

-- Conduct a cyberattack on Iran's infrastructure (Doing so could expose Israel's cyber capabilities prematurely and would not be an in-kind response to a major airstrike.)

-- Accelerate small attacks inside Iran, including targeted assassinations, carried out by the Mossad. (Israel does not claim responsibility for such attacks, so they fail to match the public nature of Iran's strike.)Other Israeli options include doing nothing -- a measure aimed at leveraging the international and regional alliance that came together to help repel the Iranian attack into something more solid and permanent -- or adopting a more diplomatic approach, including a boycott of Iran by the United Nations Security Council, other officials said.

At least two members of the Cabinet argued at the time of the Iranian attack that Israel should respond immediately, two Israeli officials said, arguing that a rapid response in self-defense would give such a counterstrike obvious legitimacy.

Yet after three days of meetings, the Cabinet has yet to decide on a response. On Tuesday, the five-member Cabinet met with security officials for two hours of consultations, according to one official, and they were expected to convene again Wednesday.

The war Cabinet discussions are shrouded in secrecy and riven by old rivalries and distrust. Its members share histories of fierce competition as well as personal and political betrayal, which can sometimes color the details that leak out.

According to two officials' account, the main proponents of immediate retaliation over the weekend were Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot, two former military chiefs and now centrist political allies who crossed parliamentary lines to join the government in the interests of national unity after the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel.

But for reasons that remain unclear, no strike took place Sunday following the Iranian attack.

U.S. officials have publicly and privately tried to persuade Israel that it does not need to retaliate for the Iranian strike. Netanyahu, they have argued, can "take the win" earned by a successful defense against the Iranian onslaught, which caused minimal damage and injured just one person, a young Bedouin girl.

But U.S. officials have also said they understand that persuading Israel not to retaliate may be impossible. American officials have said they understand Israeli officials believe they must respond to a direct strike from Iran on Israel in a way that the world can see. A covert attack by Israel against Iran, U.S. officials said, would most likely not be enough to satisfy Netanyahu's coalition partners or the current Israeli government.

Should that counterattack prompt another round of Iranian missiles and drones, U.S. officials said, American warplanes and naval vessels would once again come to the defense of their ally against their chief adversary in the Middle East.

The U.S. is also backing diplomatic efforts to pressure and punish Iran, including by imposing tougher sanctions on the country in the coming days, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said at a news conference in Washington on Tuesday.Yellen declined to elaborate on what form the penalties might take, but suggested that the Biden administration was considering ways to further restrict Iranian oil exports. The U.S. is also looking at ways to cut off Iran's access to military components that it uses to build weapons such as the drones that it launched toward Israel over the weekend, according to a Treasury official, who declined to be named in order to discuss private deliberations.

"Treasury will not hesitate to work with our allies to use our sanctions authority to continue disrupting the Iranian regime's malign and destabilizing activity," Yellen said before the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

As Israel faces pressure from its allies to avert a broader conflict with Iran, several countries, including Russia, China and Japan, have also been urging Iran to avoid further escalation.

And the European Union is considering expanding economic sanctions against Iran's weapons program to punish it for last weekend's attack on Israel and try to prevent any escalation of violence across the Middle East, the EU's top diplomat said Tuesday.

"I'm not trying to exaggerate when I say that, in the Middle East, we are at the edge of a very deep precipice," Josep Borrell Fontelles, the EU foreign policy chief, said after a hastily called meeting of European diplomats to discuss the crisis.



Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Has the Iran-Israel clash 'concluded'? What can come next Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com

 

"The matter can be deemed concluded," Iran's mission to the United Nations said in a post on X just a few hours after it fired more than 300 drones and missiles in retaliation of Israel's alleged attack on April 1 on Iranian consulate in Damascus, the capital of Syria, killing seven officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including two senior commanders.

However, the impression that Israel and Iran have got even and are back from a dangerous brink could be a gross misreading of the event. With its direct attack on Israel, Iran has crossed a thick red line since both the countries had always avoided direct military engagement despite Iran's support to a long-drawn proxy wars in Israel's neighbourhood in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen where Iran supports militant groups, notably Hezbollah and the Houthis, which have been in armed conflict with Israel. 

Importantly, in the wake of Iran's recent missile and drone attacks on Israel, US President Joe Biden has privately expressed grave concerns about the possibility of a "catastrophic escalation" in the hostilities between Israel and Iran. Senior US defense officials have relayed their fears that Israel's potential retaliatory measures against Iran could lead to an uncontrollable escalation in the region.

Interpreting Iran's strike on Israel

Iran says the attack was in response to an airstrike widely blamed on Israel that destroyed what Iran says were consular offices in Syria and killed two generals with its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard earlier this month.

Israel said almost all the over 300 drones and missiles launched overnight by Iran were shot down by its anti-missile defense system, backed by the US and Britain. The sole reported casualty was a wounded girl in southern Israel, and a missile struck an Israeli airbase, causing light damage. Still, the chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard called the operation successful.

Iran has managed to strike a balance between retaliating publicly for the strike in Damascus and avoiding provoking further Israeli military action at least initially, which could lead to a much wider conflict, Mona Yacoubian, vice president of the Middle East and North Africa center at the U.S. Institute of Peace, told AP. “Both (Iran and Israel) are able at this point to claim victory and step down off the precipice, particularly since there were no Israeli civilians killed,” Yacoubian said.

Analysts say Iran sent a message that it would be willing to escalate and change its rules of engagement in its shadow war with Israel. “It’s a warning shot, saying that if Israel breaks the rules, there are consequences,” Magnus Ranstorp, strategic adviser at the Swedish Defense University, told AP.

Experts have suggested that Saturday's slow-moving drone attack was calibrated to represent a show of power but also allow some wiggle room. Many think Iran's strike was designed to cause minimum damage to lives. "It appears that Iran telegraphed its attack on Israel to demonstrate it can strike using different capabilities to complicate the (Israeli army's) ability to neutralise the assault but also to provide an off ramp to pause escalation," Nishank Motwani, senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in Washington, told AFP.

What is coming next?

The wider interpretation of the Iranian strike as a middle ground between retaliation and severe damage might suggest that Israel too would be less willing to strike back at Iran, given the Iranian strike was unable to cause much harm to Israel, with only minor damage inflicted on one base.

As leading countries in the world ask both sides to exercise restraint, Prez Biden warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the US will not take part in a counter-offensive against Iran, if Israel decides to retaliate. The US will continue to help Israel defend itself but does not want war, John Kirby, the White House’s top national security spokesperson, told ABC’s “This Week” program on Sunday.

There were reports that the Israeli war cabinet was unable to decide whether to carry out a retaliatory strike on iran. An hours-long war cabinet meeting ended Sunday night without a decision about how Israel would respond.

There is a view that Israel struck at the Iranian consulate in Damascus to trigger Iranian retaliation and pull the US into a consequent wider conflict. Netanyahu could have resorted to this tactic in order to take the world's attention away from Gaza. If that's true, Israel might try to escalate the conflict.

Also, Netanyahu, who has faced public anger for failing to check the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel and then to free all the kidnapped civilians, may not afford to not respond to the unprecedented Iranian strike. In case of the lack of backing from the US and other major countries for a full-blown strike on Iran, Netanyahu might find other options to punish Iran such as forceful attacks on Iran-backed militants in Syria and Lebanon or strikes on Iran's military installations.

Though Iran has said its retaliation has "concluded" and Israel hasn't yet shown any willingness to strike back, the fact that can't be ignored is that the strikes have changed the equation between the two countries: for the first time, Iran has mounted a direct attack on Israel. This turn can take the two countries to a dangerous terrain where attacking each other directly in future becomes a ready option. The strike has thrown the possibility of a full-blown war between the two countries wide open though when, where and how remain moot points.