Pages

Thursday, July 30, 2020

Zuckerberg, Bezos, Sundar Pichai and Tim Cook getting heat from US Cong on competition



WASHINGTON: Four Big Tech CEOs, Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai of Google and Tim Cook of Apple, are set to answer for their companies' practices before Congress as a House panel caps its yearlong investigation of market dominance in the industry.

The powerful executives are set to defend their companies as buttressing competition and offering essential services to consumers. The four CEOs are testifying remotely for a hearing Wednesday by the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.


President Donald Trump, meanwhile, continued to denounce the big tech companies, which he has accused, without evidence, of bias against him and conservatives in general. In a tweet, he challenged Congress to crack down on the companies.``If Congress doesn't bring fairness to Big Tech, which they should have done years ago, I will do it myself with Executive Orders,`` Trump tweeted before the start of the hearing. ``In Washington, it has been ALL TALK and NO ACTION for years, and the people of our Country are sick and tired of it!``

Trump's Justice Department has urged Congress to roll back long-held legal protections for online platforms such as Facebook, Google and Twitter. The proposed changes would strip some of the bedrock protections that have generally shielded the companies from legal responsibility for what people post on their platforms.

The four tech CEOs command corporations with gold-plated brands, millions or even billions of customers, and a combined value greater than the entire German economy. One of them, Bezos, is the world's richest individual; Zuckerberg is the fourth-ranked billionaire.

Critics question whether the companies stifle competition and innovation, raise prices for consumers and pose a danger to society.

In its bipartisan investigation, the Judiciary subcommittee collected testimony from mid-level executives of the four firms, competitors and legal experts, and pored over more than a million internal documents from the companies. A key question: whether existing competition policies and century-old antitrust laws are adequate for overseeing the tech giants, or if new legislation and enforcement funding is needed.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. David Cicilline, a Rhode Island Democrat, has called the four companies monopolies, although he says breaking them up should be a last resort. While forced breakups may appear unlikely, the wide scrutiny of Big Tech points toward possible new restrictions on its power.

``Simply put, they have too much power,'' Cicilline said in opening remarks Wednesday, as he laid out data pointing up the power of the four tech companies as essential cogs of commerce and communications.

He also said that in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, ``these giants stand to profit'' and become even more powerful as millions shift more of their work and commerce online.

The companies face legal and political offensives on multiplying fronts, from Congress, the Trump administration, federal and state regulators and European watchdogs. The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission have been investigating the four companies' practices.

Each company has a distinct profile and each tech titan has his own approach and story to tell.

For Bezos, who presides over an e-commerce empire and ventures in cloud computing, personal ``smart'' tech and beyond, it will be his first-ever appearance before Congress.

Bezos is introducing himself, in a way, in his hearing testimony, unusual for the occasion. He lays out his challenging life story growing up in New Mexico as the son of a single mother in high school, and later with an adoptive father who emigrated from Cuba at 16. Previewing his written testimony in a blog post Tuesday, Bezos traces his origins as a ``garage inventor'' who came up with the concept of an online bookstore in 1994.

He addresses the issue of Amazon's power in what he describes as a huge and competitive global retail market. The company accounts for less than 4% of retail in the U.S., Bezos maintains. ..



Wednesday, July 29, 2020

Anil Ambani loses ADAG Mumbai office to YES Bank after Rs 2,892 crore default Anil Ambani-led Reliance group is one of the biggest borrowers of YES Bank with exposure of over 12,000 crore twitter-logoBusinessToday.In | July 29, 2020 | Updated 19:26 IST

Anil Ambani loses ADAG Mumbai office to YES Bank after Rs 2,892 crore default
YES Bank has reportedly taken possession of Reliance Centre in Mumbai, the headquarter of Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG), after the company failed to repay dues worth Rs 2,892 crore. The Anil Ambani-led group is one of the biggest borrowers of YES Bank with exposure of over 12,000 crore.
The bank has taken over 21,000 square feet building of ADAG in Santacruz and also two floors in Nagin Mahal in South Mumbai, which was its previous headquarters, as per an advertisement published in Financial Express on Wednesday. The bank acquired the building on July 22 under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFESI) Act.
In March, Anil Ambani was questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) with regard to ADAG's position with respect to its exposure to YES Bank. As per Reliance Group spokesperson, Ambani had told the ED officials that all transactions between ADAG and YES Bank were in compliance with the law and financial regulations. He had said that the group is committed to honour the repayment obligations of all its borrowings from YES Bank through asset monetisation programmes.
In connection with YES Bank founder Rana Kapoor and others, Ambani had said that the Reliance Group has no direct or indirect exposure to Kapoor, his wife or daughters, or any entity controlled by them.
In May, the ED filed a charge sheet against Rana Kapoor, his daughters Roshni Kapoor, Radha Kapoor and Rakhee Kapoor, along with Morgan Credits, Yes Capital and Rab Enterprises in connection with the YES Bank fraud case. Kapoor, who has been accused of receiving kickbacks in lieu of sanctioning loans to certain firms, was arrested by the ED on March 8 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Source Business Today July 29 2020

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Relief for Vodafone Idea! SC directs for tax refunds of ₹833 crore livemint. Updated: 22 Jul 2020, 05:34 PM IST

Earlier SC directed the Income Tax department to issue refund of  ₹733 crore to Vodafone Idea for assessment year 2014-15
In a relief to Vodafone Idea, the Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Income-Tax department to refund the telecom company 833 crore, pending for the assessment year (AY) 2014-15.
On April 29, the apex court directed the Income Tax department to issue refund of 733 crore to Vodafone Idea for assessment year 2014-15.
The telecom service provider has been facing a financial crisis after the apex court ordered it to pay adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues and penalties worth 53,000 crore.
The telco had earlier sought over 5,000 crore refund for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18. For AY 2014-15, the Indian entity of Vodafone Idea filed income-tax returns, for 1,532 crore. In November 2015, Vodafone filed returns for AY 2015-16, claiming a refund of 1,355.51 crore. A year later, the company claimed a refund of 1,128.47 crore for AY 2016-17. For AY 2017-18, Vodafone claimed a refund of 743 crore.
The I-T department withheld the refund claiming that massive outstanding dues are pending and are yet to be settled with the telco. The apex court mentioned that the I-T department cannot withhold refunds against undetermined future demands.

Tax on gifts: Documents that you should have :-ET


Gifting is often used to transfer property or money within the family or to relatives by way of will or inheritance. However, gift has also been used as a medium to evade taxes due to which the government had introduced the Gift Tax Act, 1958 (GTA) to curb tax evasion activities. GTA was later repealed and the incidence of tax was comprehensively incorporated in the Income-tax Act, 1961 (ITA) to ensure that bogus transactions are not carried out with the sole objective of tax avoidance.

As per the ITA, amount of money exceeding Rs 50,000 received without consideration is subject to tax as income from other sources in the hands of the recipient. Similarly, if an immovable property having stamp duty value in excess of Rs 50,000 or a movable property such as shares of a company or jewellery or work of art etc. having fair market value in excess of Rs 50,000 is received without consideration, the same is subject to tax in the hands of the recipient. Such income is taxable at applicable tax rates in the year of receipt. However, the ITA also specifies certain categories of transactions which are not covered under the ambit of taxation and it is very important for a recipient of the gift to ensure whether or not the gift received by him is subject to tax.

While a certain transaction may be genuine and free from tax incidence, given the value which may be involved, there is every chance that the tax authorities may question the validity of the transaction and ask for proof to substantiate that the same is not subject to tax.

For example, say you have received Rs 3 lakh in cash on your wedding by way of gift in aggregate from 300 guests and you decide to deposit the same into your bank account. As per the reporting norms, the bank may be required to report this cash deposit with the tax authorities. The tax authorities may question the source of cash receipt to ensure that this is not an undisclosed income which could have fetched tax revenue for the authorities.

Though the ITA specifically provides that any sum of money received on the occasion of marriage of an individual is not to be treated as his/her income, the question arises as to how will you justify that such cash was indeed received on the occasion of marriage. In such a case, it would be useful to maintain a digital or manual register of guests and note down the sum of money gifted by each. This can be used as a proof to justify to the tax authorities the genuineness of the cash deposit made by you in the bank.

Another such example is receipt of money from your relatives which is specifically excluded from the ambit of taxation. If your relative transfers a sum of Rs 10 lakh to your bank account, you may have to justify the source of the money to the tax authorities. It would be prudent to execute a gift deed which acts as documentary evidence for the receipt of gift by the recipient. When an immovable property is transferred as a gift, it is mandatory to execute a a gift deed which acts as documentary evidence for the receipt of gift by the recipient. When an immovable property is transferred as a gift, it is mandatory to execute a gift deed. The same mechanism can be adopted to substantiate receipt of money from the relative in the current example. Other documents such as your bank statement or copy of cheque received etc. may also be maintained.

Property or money received under a will or by way of inheritance is not subject to tax in the hands the recipient. If an immovable property is received under a will, the recipient should try to obtain original buyer's agreement of the property, details and back-up of sums paid to acquire the property by the original buyer (giver of gift) and a copy of the will which will act as proof in case any queries are raised by the tax authorities.

Given the increased scrutiny by the tax authorities, the giver and recipient of the gift should exercise due caution to safeguard themselves from any enquiry. While the documents to be maintained for each gift received would differ as per the nature of transaction, it is prudent to maintain appropriate records to justify the genuineness of the transaction.

(The writer is Tax Partner, People Advisory Services, EY India)
(Views expressed are personal)

Saturday, July 18, 2020

IT LOOKS THAT TRAI (TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ) JUST WORK FOR RELIANCE JIO ONLY WHO IS BENT UPON DESTROYING COMPETITION IN TELECOM SECTOR.

Image result for TRAI

TDSAT sets aside Trai order blocking Vodafone-Idea premium tariff plan

The appellate tribunal stayed the telecom regulator's July 11 order blocking Vodafone Idea Ltd's RedX premium tariff plan, granting interim relief to the struggling telecom carrier. VIL shares surged 15% in intraday trade.

Monday, July 6, 2020

Did you notice that the alphabet *"C"* has shot to prominence in this Covid-19 era?


See the Sea of Change that the alphabet *C* has brought!
No one expected that the alphabet "C" would play a Completely overwhelming role compared with any of the other alphabets...
Cough (C)
Cold (C)
Corona virus (C)
Covid-19 (C)
Case (C)
Confirmed (C)
Confinement (C)
Contamination (C)
Containment (C)
Curfew (C)
Two most serious "C"s are,
Cemetery (C)
Cremation (C)
The possible remedial drug is, Chloroquine (C)
The beauty is, it started from China (C)....
But at the same time,
GOD smiled, and said...
Cleanliness (is the remedy...)
Courage (is the need of the hour...)
Compliance to the expert advice...
Contention to overcome the crisis...
Clarity of thought...
Cooperation with the fellow beings...
Caring for the needy..
and finally....
"Clearance" is awaited and in a Short while..
"Cure" is definitely going to "Come"......
Till then take vitamin C.....
😁
Stay Safe & Healthy

Thursday, July 2, 2020

Why did the government order to vacate Lodhi Road Bangla to Priyanka Gandhi in which she is residing since the last 23 years?

Replied thru Quora by Amit Sabharwal


Tell me following things;
  • is she a public servant?
  • is she a specialised dignitary?
  • member of any cabinet committee?
  • member of any house?
    • then why she is being treated more than any common man?
    • if she is getting so many perks why can't I?
    • why I am left without security, servant and golden house with best servants?
  • she is not even a common lady. she did the following to us.
    • land grabbers, like china. both husband-wife snatched land from farmers.
    • remember PMC bank scam where she scammed more than 5000 crores and everybody had to suffer?
    • supporting and talking like china. they never helped our jawans and people but did politics over them.
    • remember how she tried to create political crises. she said, “I arranged the buses for migrants”. what did they find? three-wheelers.
    • she thinks she is Indira Gandhi. though, Indira Gandhi was much worse. anyways, she tried to win breaily. what happened? lost with lacs of votes.
    • they are living in bungalows on our tax and doing all anti-national things. Gandhi doesn't care about us.
    • they sit in AC and ask government proof of surgical strikes.
    • the whole family is buddu. lying to the people of India and looting us on the name of welfare with other communist propagandists.
MY OPINION
not only Priyanka. the whole family should be thrown out of the country. let them feel what India mean to us. they looted us badly. they have the thrust for the seat and nothing else. no thrust fir welfare. let them go and let live in Italy. we have to support this move by the government and hope the same for the whole family.