Pages

Monday, July 19, 2021

European telcos cash in on tower assets as high-cost 5G investment looms European telecoms firms are cashing in on the money-making power of masts, as tower companies line up to pay multi-billion dollar price tags for antennas buzzing with ever more data ahead of the advent of 5G. Reuters March 03, 2021, 17:51 IST

 By Isla Binnie and Supantha Mukherjee


MADRID/STOCKHOLM : European telecoms firms are cashing in on the money-making power of masts, as tower companies line up to pay multi-billion dollar price tags for antennas buzzing with ever more data ahead of the advent of 5G.

Faced with straitened revenue growth and stubbornly high debt built up during the last network upgrade, telecoms companies are relishing the quick cash injections they can get from selling these portfolios, or future income from spin-offs.
Upgrading networks, including towers, for 5G - which promises an age of self-driving cars and brain surgery performed at a distance - will soak up some $890 billion between 2020 and 2025, the GSMA industry body says.

European operators are increasingly willing to exploit assets to help finance those build-outs. While selling towers outright brings piles of cash, many are also looking to create separate tower units or launch joint ventures with independent companies as a way to keep a chunk of potential future growth.

So far this year, Vodafone has lined up its towers business for the European sector's biggest listing since 2014, while Orange created a separate towers unit.

Independent tower companies have proved hungry to buy, snapping up more than 14 billion euros ($16.9 billion) worth of assets so far this year to access the steady, inflation-linked returns antenna-topped towers generate.

But around 66% of sites in Europe are still wholly or partially owned by phone companies, Barclays estimates, compared with less than 10% in the United States. "The market is unlocking," said Julian Plumstead, Chief Executive for Europe at American Tower, which bought more than 30,000 towers from Spain's Telefonica in January.
Compared to the United States, Plumstead told Reuters, "We are still in the early to middle ages of our industrial development, but looking forward I think the trend will continue and possibly accelerate."

GRADUALLY RELINQUISHING

In cases where operators and tower companies have signed joint ventures, the tower companies say they usually have the option to buy out the operators after a number of years.

This means some are gradually relinquishing these unlikely trophies in stages. Telefonica netted more than $9 billion with the sale to American Tower of sites it had already hived off into a separate unit in 2016.

"We fully understand the interest of the operators in going for this two-stage approach," Cellnex Deputy Chief Executive Alex Mestre told Reuters. "There is revalorization of the asset ... and the operators can seize that."

Plumstead said American Tower had managed to beef up its portfolio - from an admittedly low base - in Europe this year despite restrictions on movement.

"Getting people into the field has not been as easy... but we've built more towers this year than in Europe last year and we'll plan to do the same again this year."

Towers are prized assets partly because contracts to use them are like an "infinite marriage" in which operators pay steady rates for decades, in the words of one industry expert.

Shares of both American Tower and Cellnex touched record highs last year during the pandemic after more than doubling and more than tripling respectively in value in the last half decade.

TOWERING OVER EUROPE

Deal-making has been concentrated in Western Europe until now, but regional leader Cellnex and American Tower, whose buy from Telefonica increased its presence in Europe sevenfold, are both now looking further east and in Scandinavia.

"We are looking at a wider geographic scope," Cellnex's Mestre said. "We have started also in the Nordics, we have started in Poland and in all those areas in our core geographies where we believe there are still a lot of towers yet to be outsourced."

Almost all European operators are now discussing what they should do with their tower assets, industry executives say.

High multiples paid for recent deals have piqued their interest. American Tower paid Telefonica around 30x its tower unit's most recent core earnings for the assets, according to analysts at Moody's.

Operators willing to part with their towers have commanded average valuations 22.1 times higher than the assets' core earnings since mid-2018, Moody's also said. Cellnex clinched the lowest price among recent deals, paying 16x earnings for a portfolio from Poland's Play last October.

"If you conclude that it's not really a competitive advantage to own the towers, then you should dispose of them because the multiple arbitrage is high," said Nikos Stathopoulos, chairman of mobile operator United Group, which owns 6,000 towers in Bulgaria, Slovenia and Croatia.

Sweden's Telia is also considering wringing money out of its more than 9,000 towers by partnering with external investors, a spokeswoman told Reuters, while Telenor is also aiming to generate value from its tower portfolio, a representative said.

Source:-ET Telecom and used here for Educational Purposes only

HOW PUNJAB GOVT. ALONGWITH FEW OTHERS FAILED TO USE VENTILATORS IN EMRGENCY SITUATIONS PROVIDED UNDER P.M.CARE FUND.

 By Rahul Sharma thru Quora-Heading changed as original heading created negative confusion-used here for educational purposes here as this is totally non commercial blog

All the ventilators provided under PM Care funds are of superior quality and have absolutely no issue. It's just that some states failed to even get them installed on time and when they were criticized for delay, they asked a doctor to call them defective.

After Covid-19 hit India last year, the Centre ordered 60,858 ventilators — sensing that there was a need to augment the numbers — of which 58,850 were made in India.

Under the PM Cares scheme 50,000 were procured, and 49,960 were allocated. Of these, 43,788 dispatched to state governments or medical facilities. This included nearly 12,000 ventilators supplied after April 7'2021.

Data accessed by India Today TV showed that of the 43,788 ventilators dispatched, only 38,803 were installed by April 6′ 2021. This means that about 5,000 ventilators which stand between life and death of a patient were or are yet to be installed.

Punjab's claims found false:

In the recent days, the Punjab government and medical institutes in the state have mounted a huge criticism of the quality of ventilators supplied under PM Cares scheme.

However, documents and chronology of events reveal another dimension to the crisis.

The first batch of 25 ventilators from the Centre reached Punjab government’s central store on October 8, 2020. By October 28, 2020, 75 more had reached the Punjab central store.

Health ministry sources say that the manufacturer of those 100 ventilators, Jyoti CNC, a Gujarat-based company confirmed that since October, several communications were sent to the Punjab government to find when the ventilators were to be installed. Sources say that during a video conference the Punjab government officials even bluntly claimed that they can be taken back and were not needed.

In April this year, Union health secretary wrote a letter to Punjab chief secretary Viny Mahajan asking the state to speed up the installation of 251 of the 809 ventilators supplied to the state saying that “non commissioning of the ventilators defeats the purpose” of fight against the pandemic.

Finally, nudged by the Centre, the Punjab government started allocating the ventilators after six months had lapsed since supply, and when the second surge was claiming victims.

It was on April 23 that the Punjab Health System Corporation or PHSC allocated 50 ventilators to the government medical college in Patiala, and the rest 50 to the government medical college in Amritsar.

In fact, Punjab’s Covid-19 response and procurement committee head Dr Raj Bahadur admitted that 50 of the ventilators supplied under PM Cares were lying non-functional and the college wad using its own 61 ventilators.

For installation of machines supplied in October 2020, the manufacturer was contacted in the last week of April this year.

When the manufacturer’s team reached to install the machines on April 29, they found that the hospital had no connectors for their piped oxygen gas system to link the machines.

Sources said It was the manufacturer of the ventilators who hunted the local market and developed the connectors to fit and install 30 of the machines. A Union health ministry official said, “Each hospital’s piped oxygen system has a specific connector and it’s the responsibility of the hospital to procure them. But in six months, the state government didn’t think of procuring the connectors.”

This was not all. The manufacturer also found that in most cases the oxygen pressure in the hospitals was not adequate to operate 50 odd ventilators installed (all supplied in October last year).

Audit findings :

The audit ordered by the prime minister has already started receiving a lot of data and information on how the ventilators were mismanaged. Records maintained by domestic manufacturers certified to supply ventilators narrate a story of indifference and unpreparedness on part of states to utilise the ventilators.

Many states didn’t have a plan which medical facility was to get the ventilators. So, states such as Punjab took charge of the ventilators, and stashed them on central stores for months.

In Firozabad in Uttar Pradesh, 65 ventilators were allocated to a medical college. They lay there for six months and now the college says it does not have the infrastructure to install them. It has told the state government to take them away.

In Maharashtra, Nashik municipal corporation Kailash Jadhav said the city medical facilities didn’t have connectors to fit the ventilators

In Supaul in Bihar, the ventilators reached the government hospitals, but the hospital authorities say they do not have staff to operate the machines.

Rajasthan, where the ventilators were considered to be non functional for govt use. But were in full functional order to be rented out to private hospitals who used them properly while govt hospitals had people dying without ventilators. After an expose they took it back but did not use it either.

In short, there is absolutely no problem with ventilators and the problem was getting them installed.

Also like all other electronic items, these ventilators come with manufacturers warranty and if there was a problem was some machines, problem could be fixed by manufacturer. However there are no problems reported to them whatsoever.

No wonder why Punjab has highest covid mortality rate in India, 2.38% compared to a national average of 1.11 percent.

Thanks for reading.

Rahul.

BANKING FRAUD BY BANKS*

 Contributor HazariLal


*Sharing with you real experience related to have SENIOR CITIZEN SAVING SCHEME (SCSS) DEPOSIT.*

Banks are looting our hard earned money. Senior citizens invest in SCSS for better interest (always 0.7% higher than PPF) and safety as it is guaranteed by the Government of India.

However, fraud starts when the deposit holder dies and nominee/legal heir is forced to close the deposit by the law.

Banks treat such closure as premature closure of deposits and refund the money after deducting penalty. This deduction is the fraud and most accept this deduction as genuine deduction as they lack the knowledge or they don't have time to follow up with authorities.


Income Tax website clearly mentions rules governing SCSS deposit. Sub section 5 of rule 8 clearly states that no penalty deduction shall apply in case the deposit holder dies.The original gazette notification for this SCSS scheme is 490 (E).

Some one has just experienced this fraudulent deduction from BANK OF INDIA KANDIVALI (W) station branch, Mumbai. He fought for about 45 days with the bank with emails to higher authorities, personal visits and twitter tagging. Eventually he received about 9500 back from the bank that was deducted as penalty treating the SCSS deposit closure as premature despite the fact that the closure was due to death of the deposit holder.

Just imagine how many SCSS deposit holders must be dying every year and amount that banks may be deducting as penalty for closure!

Update your information on such schemes. Be aware. We request all RETIREES ASSOCIATIONS & FEDERATIONS, & individuals, to take up the matter with finance ministries and IBA & CEO OF all banks to issue, IMMEDIATELY, circular to STOP this unjust & cruel penality to widow of deceased depositor.

Saturday, July 17, 2021

SC may hear AGR modification case on July 19 Earlier this year, Vi appealed to the top court to modify or clarify its order to allow the government to consider the telco’s submissions on the calculation errors and rectify them accordingly. ETTelecom July 16, 2021, 18:48 IST

 


The Supreme Court may hear on July 19 the pleas filed by Bharti Airtel Vodafone Idea (Vi) and Tata Teleservices who have sought recalculation of their adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues. The top court's decision will be most crucial for loss-making Vi which has in the past raised concerns over its viability, largely due to the statutory dues and is hoping for a reduction in its AGR liability.

Earlier this year, Vi appealed to the top court to modify or clarify its order to allow the government to consider the telco’s submissions on the calculation errors and rectify them accordingly. Vi has to pay Rs 58,400 crore in AGR dues, of which it has paid Rs 7,854 crore. The telco had self-assessed its dues at Rs 21,533 crore, which the Supreme Court had rejected.

Airtel has sought modification, clarification or recall of “mistaken orders” that allowed the government to demand Rs 43,980 crore as AGR dues against the telco’s calculation of Rs 13,004 crore.

Both telcos highlighted the manifold increase in AGR dues as a result of “arithmetical errors”.

Tata Tele told the court that the demands of the DoT exceeded its deemed revenue and added up to more than the book balance. The DoT has demanded AGR dues of Rs 16,798 crore from the company which sld its consumer mobility business to Airtel some years back.

During the hearing, the DoT and the telcos also hope for clarity regarding the timing of the first instalment of AGR dues.

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court had ruled last September that the telecom operators must pay 10% of the total AGR dues as demanded by DoT by March 31, 2021 and the remainder in equal instalments every financial year up to March 31, 2031.

Vi, Airtel and Tata Tele have said that they have already paid more than 10% of their total AGR dues and don’t need to pay anything by March 31, 2021.

However, DoT’s interpretation is that the court meant 10% of the remaining AGR dues when it asked the operators to pay that much by end of FY21 as it was aware of the payments they already made.
Airtel, Vi and Tata Tele have so far paid over Rs 18,000 crore, Rs 7,854 crore and Rs 4,197 crore, respectively, in late 2019 and early 2020.

DoT has filed a status report in SC on the dues received so far and if SC agrees with DoT's view, then cash strapped Vi will need to raise funds even more urgently.


Source ET Telecom news and used here for Educational purposes of small Investors only and this blog is non commercial

Friday, July 16, 2021

GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED :-CASE LISTED FOR JULY 19 2021

 


3821  Play CAPTCHA Audio

Diary No.Year
 

Diary No.- 13381 - 2021
GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED vs. EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED

Diary No.
13381/2021 Filed on 11-06-2021 11:56 AM
PENDING
   [SECTION: X]
Case No.
W.P.(C) No. 000649 - / 2021  Registered on 15-06-2021
(Verified On 15-06-2021)
Present/Last Listed On19-07-2021 [HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI] [CL.NO. : 1]
Status/StagePENDING (Motion Hearing
[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]) List along with case (LIST WITH I.A. NO. 108871/20 IN SLP (C) NO. 5256/20)-Ord dt:30-06-2021
Tentatively case may be listed on (likely to be listed on)19-07-2021 (Computer generated)
Category2811-Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking : Matters relating to Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Reinforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Act
Petitioner(s)

  1 GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
  3RD FLOOR, GLOBAL VISION, MIDC TTC INDUSTRIAL AREA, MAHAPE , DISTRICT: NAVI MUMBAI ,NAVI MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

Respondent(s)

  1 EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
  REGISTERED OFFICE AT EDELWEISS HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, OFF. CST ROAD, KALINA , DISTRICT: MUMBAI ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  2 OAKTREE CAPITAL GROUP PVT. LTD.
  80 RAFFLES PLACE, NO51-03 UOB PLAZA 1, SINGAPORE- 048624

  3 BANK OF AMERICA MERRIL LYNCH
  THR. ITS SUBSIDIARY DSP MERILL LYNCH LTD. 18TH FLOOR, A WING, ONE BKC, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI THR. ITS REPRESENTATIVE SHIVPREET TATHGIR ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  4 DAVIDSON KEMPNER ASIA LIMITED
  1501, 15/F, LHT TOWER 31 QUEENS ROAD, CENTRAL, CENTRAL HONG KONG

  5 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
  THR. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF BANKING REGULATIONS, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, 12TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  6 CANARA BANK
  112, J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE ,BANGALORE , KARNATAKA

  7 CORPORATION BANK
  P.B. NO. 88, MANGLADEVI TEMPLE ROAD, MANGALORE-575001 ,MANGALORE CITY , KARNATAKA

  8 INDIAN BANK
  THR. ITS MANAGER NEW NO. 66, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI ,CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU

  9 IDBI BANK LIMITED
  IDBI TOWER, WTC COMPLEX, CUFFE PARADE ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  10 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIALIMITED
  6TH FLOOR, YOGAKSHEMA, NARIMAN POINT ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

Pet. Advocate(s)

  SANDEEP SUDHAKAR DESHMUKH

Resp. Advocate(s)
U/Section

Why is Japan funding 81% of Bullet Train Project with 0.1% interest? What do they gain from it? Replied by Prabhu Chintala through Quora

So Japan is offering us a soft loan of $15 billion to help build our high speed railway infrastructure. So what is the catch? Remember that there are no free lunches in this world. Japan is not our altruistic rich brother to help us build our home. It is a plain buisiness strategy and an effective sales pitch. Let us analyse the loan as to what it is, how is it going to be implemented and why?

What is the loan?
Japan offers us to give a soft loan of $15 billion at a rate of 0.5 percent interest**
** conditions apply
Here comes the catch:
Japan has offered to meet 80% of Mumbai-Ahmedabad high speed train project cost provided India buys 30% of the equipment including coaches and locomotives from Japanese firms.

(Pic from google)
Why was the loan offered?

  • Economic perspective: Japan is the worlds third largest economy. Japan has a declining population rate and its youngsters are more focussed on their jobs and careers than on their personal relationships. So naturally the birth rates decline and their demography ages. The working population reduces and there is a stall in consumption and hence demand. The economy undergoes stagnation.
  • The sovereign wealth fund i.e the excess money ( the savings and accumulated forex) of Japan is huge.

So consider a situation like this- A shop keeper selling high end goods has stagnant sales. He has accumulated profits over a period of time when the sales were booming. Now his sales are not growing rapidly as they used to as the people within the area are rich and all their needs are satisfied. So the shop keeper comes up with a plan to take a certain amount of money from his accumulated profits and give some to a middle class person as a cheap loan for his daughter's marriage provided he buys atleast 30% of the marriage requirements from his shop.So
 it is a win win situation. The middle class person gets a cheap loan than those available outside and the shopkeeper gets interest for his money albeit a small one and also increase his sales. Seeing this deal more persons may approach shopkeeper for simuliar deals.So
 in the end the shop keeper cleverly uses his idle money to gain goodwill, get interest and also increase his sales without loosing anything.

  • So India gets money to build its high speed rail infra and Japanese companies are involved in supplying a substantive amount of equipment.

Geo-political situation:

  • Taming the chinese dragon: The chinese have the largest high speed rail network in the planet. Their HSR system is cheaper than the Japanese shinkansen but the Japanese have more reliability on safety
  • China has been awarded the feasibility study oppurtunity to study the HSR Network between Mumbai and Delhi
  • So if there are two shopkeepers instead of one in the above analogy, then more competetion and more sweeter deals
  • China has won the contract to build a HSR in Indonesia beating the Japanese
  • So Japan hopes that the Mumbai-Ahmedabad deal will be swung in its favour by the soft financing.
  • Japan also views aggressive chinese investments overseas with suspicion as a tool for growing chinese dominance in the S.E.Asian region.
  • Japan also views India as a reliable ally and a partner in checking the chinese dragon.

So the offering of the sweet deal is a mix of economic ingenuity and geo politics at play

Thursday, July 15, 2021

VODAFONE IDEA CASE STATUS AS PER SCI SITE

 


4248  Play CAPTCHA Audio

Diary No.Year
 

Diary No.- 21280 - 2020
UNION OF INDIA vs. RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. ETC. ETC.
Diary No.
21280/2020 Filed on 30-09-2020 03:52 PM
PENDING
   [SECTION: XVII]
Case No.
MA 001880 - / 2020  Registered on 12-10-2020
Present/Last Listed On19-07-2021 [HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH] [CL.NO. : 301]
Status/StagePENDING (Motion Hearing
[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]) List Before Appropriate Bench (as per ROP)-Ord dt:05-11-2020
Category1900-Three Judges Bench Matter
Act
Petitioner(s)

  1 UNION OF INDIA
  UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMUNICATION, SANCHAR BHAVAN, 20, ASHOKA ROAD , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

Respondent(s)

  1 RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. ETC. ETC.
  H-BLOCK , 1ST FLOOR, DHIRUBHAI AMBANI KNOWLEDGE CITY , DISTRICT: NAVI MUMBAI ,NAVI MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  2 VODAFONE INDIA LTD
  PENINSULA CORPORATE PARK GANPAT RAO KADAM MARG, LOWER PAREL , DISTRICT: MUMBAI ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA , DISTRICT: MUMBAI ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  3 TATA TELESERVICES LTD
  10TH FLOOR, TOWER 1 JEEVAN BHARTI, 124 CONNAUGHT CIRCUS , DISTRICT: DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI , DISTRICT: DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

  4 M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD
  THROUGH ITS M.D., BHARTI CRESCENT, 1 NELSON MANDELA ROAD, VASANT KUNJ PHASE II , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

  5 M/S. BHARTI HEXACOM LTD.
  THROUGH ITS M.D., ARAVALI CRESCENT, 1 NELSON MANDELA ROAD, VASNT KUNJ, PHASE- II , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI , DISTRICT: DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

  6 SISTEMA SHYAM TELESERVICES LTD.
  MTS TOWER, 3 AMRAPALI CIRCLE VAISHALI NAGAR , DISTRICT: JAIPUR ,JAIPUR , RAJASTHAN , DISTRICT: JAIPUR ,JAIPUR , RAJASTHAN

  7 TATA INTERNET SERVICE LTD.
  10TH FLOOR, TOWER JEEVAN BHARTI, 124 CONNAUGHT CIRCUS , DISTRICT: DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI , DISTRICT: DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

  8 TRACK ONLINE NET INDIA LTD.
  AB 11, COMMUNITY CENTRE SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE , DISTRICT: DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

  9 ETISALAT DB TELECOM PVT. LTD
  THROUGH ITS M.D., 7TH AND 8TH FLOOR, TECHNIPLEX NEAR VEER SAVARKAR FLYOVER GOREGAON (WEST) , DISTRICT: MUMBAI ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA , DISTRICT: MUMBAI ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA

  10 M/S DISHNET WIRELESS LTD.
  THROUGH ITS M.D, 5TH FLOOR SPENCER PLAZA, 769, ANNASALAI , DISTRICT: CHENNAI ,CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU , DISTRICT: CHENNAI ,CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU

  11 S.TEL PVT. LTD
  THROUGH ITS M.D., BATRA HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR SCO-61, SECTOR -29 , DISTRICT: GURGAON ,GURGAON , HARYANA , DISTRICT: GURGAON ,GURGAON , HARYANA

  12 IDEA CELLULAR LTD.
  1005-1006, 10TH FLOOR, KAILASH BUILDING , 26 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI

  13 M/S VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD.
  THROUGH ITS M.D., PLOT NO. 296, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE - II , DISTRICT: GURGAON ,GURGAON , HARYANA , DISTRICT: GURGAON ,GURGAON , HARYANA

  14 GUJARAT INFO PETRO LTD.
  BLOCK NO. 15, 3RD FLOOR, UDYOG BHAWAN., SECTOR -11 , DISTRICT: GANDHINAGAR ,GANDHINAGAR , GUJARAT , DISTRICT: GANDHINAGAR ,GANDHINAGAR , GUJARAT

Pet. Advocate(s)

  GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1]

Resp. Advocate(s)

  FAISAL SHERWANI [R-9]

Intervenor Advocate(s)

  SWETANK SHANTANU[INT]

  GAURAV KEJRIWAL[INT]

  E. C. AGRAWALA[INT]

  HARSH KAUSHIK[INT]

  SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[INT]

  KISHORE KUNAL[INT]

  PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[INT]

   PAREKH & CO.[INT]

  DEVASHISH BHARUKA[INT]