" Lawyers decide what you want to decide Some of the country's top lawyers have become the biggest fixers in the Supreme Court today..."_*
***********************
A few months ago, there was a program on a TV channel featuring former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, who was then a Rajya Sabha MP, Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and many others.
When the anchor questioned former Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi about the Indian judiciary, former Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that although I wanted to, I could not reform the Indian judiciary because our judicial system is under the control of some big brokers (fixers). And these big fixers run their justice system the way they want it to.
At the event, Justice Ranjan Gogoi raised even bigger questions on the judiciary, such as, if India wants to build a 5 trillion economy, it cannot have a 5 trillion economy unless India changes the justice system because India's judiciary is so fragile and crumbling. It is weakening not only the country but also the economy and the fabric of this country.
*He further said that India's justice system can never do justice to the middle class or the poor and it is a bitter truth that if you are a billionaire with a lot of money then you will get justice and your lawyers will tell the judges what to do.*
*Lawyers decide what you want to decide Some of the country's top lawyers have become the biggest fixers in the Supreme Court today.*
*Justice Ranjan Gogoi's statement has not been acted upon by the Supreme Court as every Supreme Court judge knows that he is in the clutches of big fixers like Dushyant Dave, Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Prashant Bhushan and these people run the Supreme Court of India as they please* .
*How bitter Justice Ranjan Gogoi was, I think it would have been better if he had given some examples and some names.*
*There are two cases, both are very similar*
*BJP leader Kirit Somaiya was accused by the Maharashtra government of accepting donations from the people to save INS Virat and did not give any account of those donations to the government. He applied for pre-arrest bail in three courts, but all three courts did not grant him pre-arrest bail.*
*Now look at another example, Teesta Javed Sitalwad, who was baking bread during the Gujarat riots, received donations of around Rs 100 crore from various countries including Gulf countries, US and UK. She used the trust's money to buy gold jewelry at Dubai airport or duty-free liquor at the UK airport, while another trustee of the same trust, Sabrang, lodged a complaint with the police.*
*The police initially investigated for 6 months, collected all the evidence, after which the police went to Mumbai to arrest Teesta Javed.*
Teesta Javed did not open the door of his house for 10 minutes, a police station in the area received a Supreme Court decision in the mail that Teesta had been ordered to stop his arrest.
It is learned that Kapil Sibal passed the order over the phone to a Supreme Court judge, meaning it was the first time in India's history that the Supreme Court had ordered a telephone hearing and ordered a telephone hearing in just 3 minutes.
Exactly the same happened in the case of Rana Ayub, who also did not audit the donations collected in the name of Gujarat riots and made a term deposit of Rs 5 crore in the name of his father. While she was going abroad, there was all the evidence against her and while stopping her from going abroad, the Mumbai High Court said that the amount of Rs 5 crore was not such a big amount that it should be considered as a big fraud.
*I remember when a bus conductor had to fight for 40 years because he did not pay 20 paise, then our court system did not say that 20 paise is not a big amount.*
*Now look at the example of yesterday's Jahangirpuri* .
*After the bulldozer reached Jahangirpuri at 10.30 am, Ulema's lawyers Kapil Sibal, Dushyant Dave and Prashant Bhushan went straight to the Supreme Court at 10.31 am and at 10:45 am the Supreme Court granted stay.*
*I was surprised. How could such a case be heard and ordered so quickly when the judiciary of India, i.e. the lower court, the high court and even the apex court were not taken into consideration?*
In other words, Justice Ranjan Gogoi rightly said that the Indian judiciary is in the hands of every court fixer in India.
https://youtu.be/08MU_kzONH8 [26/04, 10:04] DEVULAPALLI MURTI:
No comments:
Post a Comment